I found this article to be interesting because the first sentence was not a hard lead, but the rest of the lead was. It gave one piece of information but it was very vague. The story started, "The violence stretched across 25 miles in Orange County and was as brutal as it was fast-moving." This seems like a big news story, so I was really surprised that it started like this. They may have done this because the headline already was detailed enough that the reader knew what happened. I still wouldn't have started a story like this though. I think they should have started the article with the next sentence, "In less than an hour, a 20-year-old student wielding a shotgun killed a woman in his home and two commuters during carjackings early Tuesday, shot up vehicles on a Southern California freeway, and committed suicide as police closed in, authorities said." I think they should have just put the 25 miles pieces in that sentence or a sentence that followed. It would have pulled the reader in quicker and let them know what was happening.
I feel that the rest of the article was very well done though and I think that they had a good number of sources. They talked to police and witnesses, which made it much more interesting. People enjoy reading quotes by people who were connected to the incident so interviewing witnesses was a good idea. Overall, I found this to be a good story despite the lead.